However, when that 'Predictability' is carried out by the institution that is the BBC, it has far more worrying consequences to that cohesion and community - because it then is directed towards the public that actually funds them. It is now hard to tell the difference between a BBC article and any other right wing newspaper with so much biased content. You Have To Wonder WhyThe Founder of GB2GB was shocked when, in response to one of his 50 formal complaints made directly to the BBC - as yet still unaddressed by its high ranking ECU body - he received a short curt and somewhat arrogant message from the Senior Complaints Adjudicator:
“Terry,
Journalists are entitled to decide which stories to cover and the manner in which such stories are covered…There is no requirement for a story about the leader of one political party to be treated in the same way as a separate story about another party leader…BBC News does NOT have to explain or PUBLICLY justify the editorial decisions it makes.”
Colin Tregear, Senior Complaints Adjudicator, BBC ECU"
Effectively, he is saying journalists can choose, content, theme and tone - and many members of the public have been appalled by the bias attached to all 3 elements of content, theme and tone applied to government and its ministers over the last 2 years - 50 of which are still to be addressed?
He is also saying 'YOU' the public have no say in what 'THEY' produce - funded by 'YOU'?
3 EXAMPLES OF BIAS:
1/. When a Jewish BBC presenter writes an article exclusively about threatened Jewish British citizens in the UK but does not mention the arguably more endangered Muslim citizens in the UK it shows a clear bias, and is likely to inflame even more social discourse from the 'unrepresented' other party. PREDICTABLE?
2/. When the BBC are aware of an event that occurred at a Reform party 'meeting' where a young attendee was physically assaulted by aggressive reform party supporters for 'heckling' - while reform's leader watched on smiling and making fun of her, this did not even become a BBC headline - unfathomable in any other situation, with any other politician - it shows a clear bias. Which in turn may instigate even more examples of intolerance at other political party's conferences too. PREDICTABLE?
3/. The BBC quoted the leader of the Tory party who stated that when the Labour government extended the Tory's own freeze on Income Allowance from the time the Tory party's freeze was due to end in 2028 by another 3 years, it would raise another £12 billion in revenue for the government.
What Kemi Badenoch AND the BBC failed to point out was that the OBR had already calculated WHILE her party was still in power that by their own deadline in 2028 they would have raised a record breaking £59 billion extra - Understandably Badenoch would omit that information, but for the BBC to 'aid and abet' these crucial facts is unforgivable for the most respected news platform in the world - PREDICTABLE?
*THIS IS THE PRICE THE PUBLIC PAY BBC JOURNALISTS TO DO - WITH *PUBLIC MONEY*
ONLY GB2GB ARE WORKING DAY AND NIGHT TO STOP THEM - UNPAID AND UNFUNDED?