The ambitions of the Reform, Conservative, SNP, and Green parties have all claimed - undemocratically - for Sir Keir Starmer To Resign based on an unconstitutional claim of 'Knowingly Misleading Parliament'

The BBC today mentioned at least 6 times the PM's statements 'misled Parliament' based on a false premise as revealed below? It was noted that the presenter did not mention the 6 times the 'he and the BBC' did not quote Farage's on-camera video stating "oh you F******g C***t

ONCE NEVER MIND 7 TIMES.

*While protecting Farage from the outcome of that vile video - especially, GB2GB would say just before an important *5000 SEAT DEMOCRATIC vote soon*

*THE BBC MUST BE MORE SUBTLE ABOUT ITS BIAS*

THE CLAIM?

FACTUAL EVIDENCE:

No proof the PM misled Parliament.

CONSTITUTIONAL STANDARD:

Only “knowingly misleading Parliament” forces a PM to resign.

CURRENT STATUS:

That claim is alleged, not proven.

All statements from SNP, Greens, Farage, Badenoch are allegations, beliefs, or political interpretations — not evidence.

No investigation has concluded.

No documents have been published showing wrongdoing.

Therefore, the constitutional threshold for resignation is not met.

IF THIS DOES NOT, HERE IS AN EXAMPLE OF WHAT WERE NOT ADDRESSED AT THAT TIME - WHEN THERE WAS THE ONLY *EVER* PM PROVEN LIAR - NATURALLY - BORIS JOHNSON

1. Formal parliamentary finding: “deliberately misled”

In June 2023, the House of Commons Privileges Committee concluded that Boris Johnson “deliberately misled the House” over Covid “Partygate” gatherings in Downing Street.

They found he misled Parliament multiple times about whether rules and guidance were followed, and called this a “serious contempt” of Parliament.

*This is not just media commentary—it is an official parliamentary report, endorsed by the House of Commons*

2. Documented pattern of false/misleading statements in Parliament

An investigation by The Independent and fact-checking group Full Fact found that, since the 2019 election, Johnson and his ministers made at least 27 false statements to Parliament, 17 of them by Johnson himself, and failed to correct them, as required by the ministerial code.

*These are specific, itemised statements, not just general accusations*

3. Media and academic characterisations of his record

A 2022 article in The Political Quarterly describes Johnson’s premiership as marked by a “general propensity to mislead, to misinform, to tell untruths and to lie openly” in the Commons, and notes growing concern in Westminster about this pattern.

A long-form piece in Grazia (drawing on earlier reporting) lists multiple episodes across his career—journalism, London Mayor, MP, PM—where he was sacked or criticised for dishonesty, and frames his public life as having a “history of proven dishonesty”.

*These are descriptions and judgments by reputable outlets and scholars, not legal convictions for “lying” as a criminal offence—but they are part of the public factual record*

Where were BBC JOURNALISTS THEN?

AND WHERE IS THE SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF COMMONS *NOW* ON 'BEHAVIOUR.

*NEVER COVERED IN DETAIL BY ITS OWN DUBIOUS *JOURNALISTS*

BUT SEEN Click Here

GB2GB - STANDING UP FOR FAIR MEDIA - FOR ALL *REAL* BRITISH SUPPORTING CITIZENS' - COMPLETELY UNFUNDED AND ASKING FOR JUST £1 TO SHOW SUPPORT - TW GEORGE.

£1 donation link: Click Here