This claim is quite 'creative' in that it simply means that they can employ biased reporting staff equal to those on the Daily Mail. It would be quite ludicrous to believe otherwise - especially when reading both papers.

Examples of the pure negative copy produced daily by the I is the best example however of how on most occasions they out-perform the Daily Mail in their blatant bias.

Once you marry that bias with firstly, as they they are in theory the main opposition party, they give an awful lot of copy attributed the the Conservative party which is solely designed to target the Government - with not a single reference in any detail to what the Conservatives for the preceding 14 years - and that is the most clear evidence possible when Tory ex-ministers criticise what the labour party are doing when a lot of it was caused the the previous Government.

If that were all the I fell down on then that would be more than enough to show the large element of bias shown by British media today, but they have excelled themselves even more by consistently supporting the notion that the Reform party would be the most likely winners of the next general election in 4 years time based on a few polls each by a tiny number of the voting public.

With currently just 4 MP's, a few councillors (with probably a lot more to come), no costed policies, no experience of Government whatsoever, the I have deemed they have more chance of winning that election - as opposed to the many previous elections where the liberal party have done well in by by-elections but had their chances of winning any one election dismissed by all and sundry of the media (including the I).

If judging by the 'mishaps' many of those few reform councillors have created in such a short space of time, how on earth they would cope with thousands of 'off-the-street' winners of the soon to come council elections, and their low-grade, low-expertise, nil-experienced councillors damage the Reform party over the next 4 years. It would be pure carnage - and everyone in the know knows that - except the I of course.

Even more remote is the likelihood of Nigel Farage being elected by a majority of the British public to become the next Prime Minister. Every report on him is heavily based on his views of the government, but hardly ever on his behaviour when cross examined by the occasional journalist who has the audacity to question him about his own policies or comments.

There appears to be no issues about the supporters of Reform, and their anti-social behaviour that ever causes a journalist to actually not only take him to task about it, but they deliberately do not bring up that issue as though it did not exist. There are however a large number of British citizens who abhor what IS happening socially in the UK - which will of course be addressed when GB2GB. Click Here (or any other strong independent bias towards this kind of fascism) does.

All this week I shall be highlighting clear and blatant cases of unprofessional and one-sided reporting on subjects raised by the I, with copies of any responses from them - should there be any.

For British journalism to have slipped this far down the ladder of propriety, honesty and most important of all to the British public - it shows a and total complete disregard for the interests of the British public