Firstly, which normally would be regarded as very biased to the extreme is that it has studiously disregarded all the negative actions taken by the previous Conservative government, highlighted by the very same media in the last year of that government.

Despite endless quotations and opinions sought from the Conservative government on the current government's actions by the British media, they have almost exclusively never mentioned what that previous government had actually done in the first place to make the media at the time class their term as responsible for a 'broken' country.

AND MANY OF THE SPEAKERS QUOTED WERE MINISTERS OF MP's THROUGH THOSE 14 YEARS

This shamefully obvious change towards criticising only the current government through all their reporting in the last 14 months still does not overshadow an even more biased media than that shown above.

REFORM UK:

Taking the corruption of British mainstream News Media to the maximum, it now consistently promotes and exaggerates the probability of Nigel Farage and it's outspoken views on what to do with what has been described as an 'alien invasion' mostly made illegal by the previous Tory government is more typical of any nation with the practises of Russia, Iran, North Korea.

The notion that any British Media would, historically, attribute the likelihood of a political party (Reform UK) with an election to be called 4 years from now but with currently just 4 MP's (none with any experience in actual government), no published costed manifesto, widely known for the creation of division by its leader over many years, to be as certain as they project it to be - even forecasting the margin of their win.

It certainly would be more possible if the media were allowed to peddle this 'likely' outcome for the next 4 years unchallenged - which is what organisations such as GB2GB.com intend to do with the aid of the millions of decent people living in the UK with a vote to enforce that challenge.

For decades now, British media have always stated upfront that when the Liberal Party (in all its forms) does well in by-elections, this never ever translates into the 'likelihood' of them subsequently winning any election - and they were always correct.

When the I newspaper, once notorious for its unbiased and neutral reporting for many years changed its ownership to the same group as the Daily Mail group (notoriously infamous for its blatant bias towards the Conservative party), the I likes to claim that its journalists and journalism is determined totally independently from 'the Daily Mail'.

They may report 'operationally' separate from the Mail but they are definitely much more likely to be employed 'because' they have the same aims as the Daily Mail as the owners of the whole group (DMGT) Click Here would insist on them doing.

Furthermore, the link between British National newspapers and British national TV broadcasters strengthens this corruptly and carefully structured association is by the daily process on all news related TV programmes whereby they review several times every day the headlines from 'today's newspapers' - which, by pure chance happen to be the vast majority of conservative (and now also reform) supporting newspapers?

Media is the largest single 'business' in the whole world whose products are based on creating and reporting on just 10% factual news and 90% speculation, conjecture, discussion, and un-named sources.

WHO CHALLENGES THE MEDIA - WELL, ONLY THE MEDIA? - AND NOW Get Back To Great Britain. Click Here